Thin-film microstrip lines (TFMSL) are miniaturized microstrip lines, (a
signal conductor, a dielectric and a ground conductor), located on top of
the silicon substrate or the carrier substrate. (Fig.1) The ground
metallization shields the line from the silicon substrate effects; therefore
low resistivity silicon substrates can be used without deteriorating
microwave performance. Using high-quality polymers as dielectric, e.g. BCB
or polyimide, TFMSLs have attenuation comparable with coplanar waveguides in
GaAs microwave integrated circuits. TFMSLs find more and more applications
in Si-based monolithic microwave integrated circuits and as transmission
lines in multichip modules.
Fig.1 TFMSL cross section
The propagation parameters of TFMSL can be precise and efficient described
using a simplified model. The model used differs considerable from the
conventional microstrip lines because of the differences in geometrical
dimensions. For conventional microstrip lines height and width of the signal
conductor are in the range of hundreds of microns. For TFMSLs these values
are around 10 µm, in the order of magnitude of metallization thickness.
Small dimensions increase conductor loss and finite metal conductivity and
internal inductance have been taken into account. Phase constant and
characteristic impedance deviate considerably from the lossless case and
show typical increase toward lower frequencies known from coplanar
waveguides.A distributed equivalent circuit model (Fig.2) can be used for
describing TFMSLs.
Fig.2 Distributed equivalent-circuit model of the TFMSL
The elements of the equivalent circuit (the inductance per unit length L,
the capacitance per unit length C, the resistance per unit length R and the
conductance per unit length G) are related to different physical effects and
can be determined separately. The model used to describe the dependence vs.
frequency of the TFMSL parameters is practical and efficient and is based on
the numerous approaches for microstrip lines available in the literature
[1-5]. The capacitance per unit length can be calculated by means of
Hammerstad and Jensen formulas[4] :
where co is free-space light velocity,
er,eff
is the effective relative dielectric constant, ZLO is the
characteristic impedance for lossless case with t=0 and weq,0 is
the equivalent signal conductor width without dielectric substrate, which
takes into account the finite thickness of the signal conductor.The
conductance per unit length G account for the dielectric loss of the
substrate, described by the dielectric loss tangent, tan(de).
C and G/w
are frequency independent up to the beginning of the non-TEM dispersion
(well beyond 100 GHz for typical TFMSLs). The line resistance R and
inductance L exhibit a considerable frequency dependence. The frequency
dependence is determined by the change of current density distribution in
the nonideal conductors, due to the varying current penetration into the
conductors when increasing the frequency. At low frequencies near dc the
current density is homogenous over all conductor cross sections. At high
frequencies, the skin-effect range all the conductor dimensions are large
compared with skin depth
d
and the current flows only in a shallow area at the conductor surface.
Between these two regions there is a transient range that may be widely
extended. Djorgjevic and Sarkar formulas [3] for R and L are used to calculate R and L
for the entire frequency range, taking into account the external inductance covering the magnetic field outside of the conductor, the internal inductance describing the magnetic field inside the conductor, the conductor resistance under skin-effect and dc conditions. The propagation quantities, i.e. complex characteristic impedance ZL,eq, attenuation aeq and effective relative dielectric constant er,eff,eq can be determined based on the equivalent-circuit elements R,L,C,G.
|
Fig.3,4,5 present effective relative dielectric constant, attenuation and
real of characteristic impedance for a TFMSL with w=8µm, hs=1.7µm,
t=0.8µm, wg=88µm, conductivity of the metallization k=2.5*107S/m,
BCB with er=2.7 and tan(de)=0.015.
Fig.3. Effective relative dielectric constant vs.frequency
Fig.4. Attenuation vs.frequency
Fig.5. Real(Z) vs.frequency
Accuracy of this model is established by comparing the line parameters to
numerical full-wave simulation results, which takes into account conductor
and dielectric losses [4].There are some geometrical limitations related to
the metal thickness, signal and ground-conductor width, which restrict the
range of validity of the model. But, once these conditions are fulfilled the
model yields under 2% to 8% deviations for propagation quantities, an
accuracy sufficient for application of the model in practical circuit
design. The frequency range of validity extends down to dc and well into the
submillimeter-wave range.
References
1. H.Wheeler "Transmission-line Properties of a Strip on a Dielectric
Sheet on a Plane" IEEE Trans.Microwave Theory Tech. Vol.25, no.8, 1977
2. F.Schneider, W. Heinrich "Model of Thin-Film Microstripe Line for
Circuit Design" IEEE Trans.Microwave Theory Tech. Vol.49, no.1, 2001
3. A. Djordjevic, T. Sakar "Closed-Form Formulas for
Frequency-Dependent Resistance and Inductance per Unit Length of Microstrip
and Strip Transmission Line" IEEE Trans.Microwave Theory Tech. Vol.42, no.2,
1994
4. E. Hammerstad, O. Jensen "Accurate Model for Microstripe
Computer-aided Design" IEEE MTT-S Int.Microwave Symp.Dig. 1980, pp.407-409
5. W. Heinrich "Full-wave Analysis of Conductor Losses on MMIC
Transmission Lines" IEEE Trans.Microwave Theory Tech. Vol.38, no.10, 1990
|